Analysis of the statement made by Dr. Peter Marks about the updated gene-based injections
Important newsletter - share!
If you think that everything that comes out of the FDA and the CDC is sacrosanct, you should stop reading now. As a healthcare professional, and a regulatory professional, I have grave concerns about the leader of an FDA Division promoting any medical products, but especially the gene-based injections. Not only has Dr. Marks persistently promoted these injections, but he is on record as stating that any reports about safety concerns are misinformation.
This is what he said this week about the gene-based injections:
“The public can be assured that these updated vaccines have met the agency’s rigorous scientific standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality. We very much encourage those who are eligible to consider getting vaccinated.”
Many people will believe this. I read some comments on Yahoo news last week, after Governor Ron DeSantis gave his edict that those under 65, and who live in Florida, should not take the gene-based injections, on the basis of their safety and efficacy profile. As I always do, I moved straight to the comments. They are always a good place to find humor. I was surprised at the level of belief that many people still have in these products. I was stunned, to be honest. There were many who were adamant that they would take the Boosters, regardless. There were others who had taken the first two, and would not take others, regardless of mandates, and propaganda. A third group had not taken any, and would not start now, regardless. The last group are clearly those who are able to somehow cut through the fear and the propaganda (otherwise known in some quarters as male cow dung), to chart their own course.
My goal is to ensure that you are informed consented. Take them if you want to, but for goodness sake, know what you are doing. I have grave concerns about these products, but I do not have the right to stop you from taking them if you believe the products are helping you. The hiding of information regarding safety prevents people from being informed consented. Most people simply believe what the people who work for the government agencies say.
Again, take these products if you want to, but be aware of the challenges, and therefore, the risks. After all, if you are warned, you can know that whatever happens, it was your informed decision.
I believe that taking these injections is like playing Russian Roulette. There are people who like the game of chance. They go to Vegas and they have a wonderful time placing their bets. It takes all sorts.
The Position of Regulator
Dr. Marks regulates these products, and cannot therefore promote them as well. While he does that, he has a conflict of interest.
The Food and Drug Administration used to have an immense amount of credibility, as far as the competent assessment of medicines was concerned. That credibility and integrity has been spent, in the eyes of many, although not in the eyes of those who read and comment on the Yahoo chat forums.
However, those in the know believe that the FDA has lost its way. This could be a result of the fact that the organization was without a leader during the COVID19 pandemic/plandemic/special operation, whatever term you want to assign. Whatever the reason, anything they say regarding COVID19 will be viewed with a degree of skepticism, in some quarters. Why? Because the Agency has “pushed” the COVID gene-based injections on an unsuspecting public.
Officials from the FDA have met with, and heard the stories of distress from the injured, and then left those meetings, and told the general public that the injections are safe and effective. This means they have ignored the evidence in the VAERS system [5] a system that suffers from under-reporting. A system, mind you, that the FDA and CDC have been talking down for 3 years. By taking this approach, they prevent people from being truly informed consented. Informed consent requires everyone to know that people have suffered serious injury after taking these injections, and a high percentage (for a product administered to the healthy), have died. To hide this is to hide the truth from people.
When the Regulator Becomes the “Pusher”
Pusher is a term usually used for the [illegal] sale of drugs that are understood to be detrimental to health. As the regulator, Dr. Peter Marks should not be the marketeer and promoter of the products because he is supposed to be regulating. Now let’s analyze his statement.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1703544992243781880
Analysis of Dr. Marks’ statement
“The public can be assured….”
“The public can be assured ——- Really?
The fact is that the public cannot, and should not be assured of anything in relation to these gene-based injections.
The facts regarding the injections, are no longer being suppressed. People now have access to information that was deliberately hidden from view by the main stream media, and social media giants, like Twitter (now known as X). Many people (clearly not everyone judging from the Yahoo forum) know about the deaths and the injuries. Again, some seem to see these through a different lens than many. However, it seems that nearly every single person in the US knows someone who took these injections, suffered serious adverse reactions, and/or died. That is despite efforts to limit access to information [3].
I have personally spoken to Mr. Ernest Ramirez, whose healthy teenage athlete son died within a few days of taking the Pfizer injection. He is sadly, not alone. You can watch his testimony below.
Despite the greater availability of information, if you search the internet for deaths from COVID19 you will still find mostly information about deaths of the un-injected. The presentation of this information is suspect, and propaganda.
….. that these updated vaccines have met the agency’s rigorous scientific standards for safety, effectiveness, …..
They are not “vaccines” in the traditional sense of the term, and should not be called such. They are a gene transfer technology that tells the body to produce a toxic substance, that is essentially a bioweapon [1]. No one knows how long the process of manufacture of the bioweapon in the body will continue for, after injection. What we know is that the injections cause cardiac toxicity, menstrual and fertility challenges, death of babies in utero, and many many more serious adverse consequences.
The gene-based injections do not prevent the spread of the virus. They do not prevent the person who took the injections from becoming ill with COVID19. There is absolutely no proof that they prevent the development of a serious form of COVID19 that could lead to death. Those studies have not been conducted. Telling people that they prevent the development of serious disease is a fantasy, and downright dishonest.
“They have met the agency’s rigorous scientific standards….. “
How rigorous can the scientific standards be? Not very rigorous or scientific, sadly. Dr. Marks, how can you make this statement with a straight face?
Yes, the FDA used to have rigorous scientific standards, but something has gone wrong in relation to these gene-based injections. If the FDA still had rigorous scientific standards, these medical products would have been withdrawn from the market, within days of reaching the market. The evidence that they are unsafe is overwhelming.
Dr. Marks, how can you encourage pregnant women to take these injections, and to allow their babies to be injected? You know full well, that we cannot know the long term effects of these injections. What we do know is that babies have died in utero and after birth.
Dr. Marks, I encourage you to review the extensive guidelines on gene transfer technologies produced by the Recombinant Advisory Committee. To ignore those guidelines is to be grossly negligent and incompetent.
…. and manufacturing quality.
Dr. Peter Marks is fully aware that the quality of the batches cannot possibly meet the normal standards of Good Manufacturing Practice, given the timeframe needed to manufacture a biological product to supply a global market. Biological manufacturing of small batches takes years, and involves extensive testing and validation of the processes. These injections did not go through that process. This could help to explain the variation in batches. See www.howbadismybatch.com.
If they are so safe, and of such a high quality, why has the Danish Medical Agency [2] demonstrated that the quality is variable? The researchers of this paper have made statements about voluntary reporting systems, which are incorrect. Perhaps this was the only way to get the paper published. Readers should take note that the website www.howbadismybatch.com has clearly demonstrated the variability in quality of the batches. The likelihood of serious injury and death is dependent on the batch injected. You would do well, if you plan to take the injections, to check the batches on the website, before you allow anyone to inject you. Unfortunately, it will take time to collect the information for the new batches that have been manufactured for the new variant.
“We very much encourage those who are eligible to consider getting vaccinated,”
Dr. Marks, as the Regulator it is NOT YOUR JOB TO ENCOURAGE anyone TO TAKE A PRODUCT THAT YOU REGULATE, least of all to take a medical product that is considered by those in the know to be UNSAFE and INEFFECTIVE.
Does “encourage” include supporting mandates so that those who refuse will lose their jobs? Where was the FDA when US businesses were demanding their employees take these injections, without regard to the safety and suitability of these products? You were silent, and therefore complicit.
What does Dr. Marks Know?
I know people who have met with Dr. Marks and told him about their injuries. He then typically leaves the meeting and effectively says, “nothing to see here - these injections are safe and effective. He also says, what you see online is misinformation.” He is deaf to their cries. Is he also blind and dumb? Is that why he refuses to tell the truth about these products?
If the gene-based injections are so safe…?
… why is there a characteristic high rate of serious adverse reactions and death within the first 5 days of taking the injections? Dr. Jessica Rose has presented on the data in VAERS [5]. Her data are credible and convincing. She is not the only person who has conducted this research.
If they are so safe, why are the manufacturers given complete indemnification from any liability whatsoever?
If the gene-based injections are so safe and effective, why are they not fully licensed? The general public believes FDA has fully licensed these injections, but the injections are ONLY available under Emergency Use. The existence of the Emergency provisions is the reason that research and development of these injections is so shortened [4].
The Food and Drug Administration needs to get back to being an independent arbiter for the safety and effectiveness of medicines. The Agency did not approve Thalidomide, and thereby saved the babies in the United States from tragic deformities. Yet now, it is standing by while pregnant women are being advised to take what was designed to be a bioweapon. How far the mighty have fallen!
It is high time that Dr. Marks recuses himself from the assessment of these products, because it is evident that he is not acting as a regulator, but as a pharma marketeer.
In conclusion
If the variant has been around for some time, and we do not see an impact on the health of the vast majority of people in the United States, why the sudden hysteria?
Some people will take the gene-based injections regardless of the risks. They have determined that the risk from the Sars-Cov-2 infection justifies any risks from these injections. That is fine. Take the injections. Be aware of the risks and consequences. However, remember that your young children and babies cannot give their informed consent. You owe it to them to be informed. When you take advice, you should be checking if they are paid to give that advice. Are they under duress to give you the advice that they are giving you. When a physician tells a young man to take the injection after he almost lost his life after the first injection, this is not someone who should be trusted. The physician should be aware that he could die when he takes the second injection. He tells him to take it because he does not want to lose his medical license. He has a mortgage to pay. See my Substack on Causality Assessment.
Taking your children in to be injected with an experimental injection is not appropriate, especially when they are not at risk from the infection. We do not know the impact on their growth potential, or their cognitive development, to mention only a few potential issues. What we do know is that there are reproductive risks, especially in women, and cardiac risks in young men, not to mention the risks of development of blood clotting issues.
I am not sure why anyone would take these risks; when health is lost, it becomes truly valuable. There is no sadder story than the story of a parent, like Mr. Ramirez who lost his son because he trusted what he was told. He did not know about the lastest research. He did not know about the deaths. He heard it was safe and effective, and being a good parent, he took his son to receive the injection. He trusted, but no one has called him from the FDA or CDC to offer condolences.
Imagine receiving an excuse from people like Gavin “I got COVID wrong” Newsom after your child has died, or has developed a life long serious illness.
Stay healthy, and keep your children physically active - there is no reason that every child cannot take up a single sport that they love and are good at. Ensure they spend as much time outside in the fresh air, as possible. They will benefit far more from a weekend to two weeks skiing and snowboarding, in the moutains, playing golf or tennis, or any other sport, than they will from an experimental gene based injection.
Reference
Dr. David E. Martin has credibly demonstrated the existence of patents going back many years to modify coronaviruses for various purposes, including bioweapon use. These patents are linked to Department of Defense as well as pharmaceutical use. The patents are available for anyone to search and study.
If you do not do anything else today, listen to this podcast.
Schmeling, M., Manniche, V., Hansen, PR., Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 30 March 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13998.
The Trusted News Inititive - https://www.bbc.com/beyondfakenews/trusted-news-initiative/
https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization
0:15 What is VAERS?
2:00 Vaccine safety. Efficacy.
4:30 Vaccine timeline.
8:50 Adverse Events counts ratios, backlog, unreported.
13:20 Historic AER 1 in 1000. Covid products 1 in 400.
15:39 AE not exclusive to a particular age group.
24:35 Potential AE Under reporting.
30:05 Causation
33:11 Spike in AE 24 hours after vaccination
You do not have to be at the mercy of the people who have information. You can understand what it means to be informed consented. Buy Clinical Trials: What Patients and Healthy Volunteers Need to Know, published by Oxford University Press.
https://global.oup.com/academic/search?q=speid&cc=us&lang=en
You can purchase it at oup.us. If you sign up for a paid subscription, you will be given a discount code to purchase the book at discount.