No, Mr. Bourla, this is what is criminal....!
It is criminal that truth has become mis-information, and mis-information has become truth.
In the West, there is a tradition of free speech. There are a number of videos of Mr. Bourla lamenting that people who spread mis-information about the experimental genetic injections, are causing the deaths of millions. I won’t show all the videos here. It saves you having to wade through unsophisticated marketing, and propaganda, regarding how wonderful the EUA-authorized Comirnaty is. Here is a segment from one of the videos. You can watch him in action for yourself.
You will notice the hypocrisy.
Mr. Bourla takes umbrage with the people who are
(1). Benefiting from the fear of people
(2). Making money from spreading what he calls mis-information.
I literally laughed out loud when I heard him make those statements. Does he have no self awareness? Which company has made the most money, from the fear of people during the COVID19 crisis? That’s right - Pfizer. Furthermore, who stands to lose the most, as more and more people say NO to these injections and Boosters? Bingo - Pfizer.
Pfizer-Biontech and Moderna will make pre-tax profits of approximately 34 Billion USD this year.
What exactly are people saying NO to?
Fainting fits
Seizures
Auto-immune diseases
Tinnitus so severe, it has caused some to commit suicide.
Cardiovascular toxicity, risk of heart attacks
Re-emergence of cancers that were treated and apparently cured.
…. and so much more.
Thanks, but no thanks.
Anyone from the regulatory or pharmaceutical sphere that says these experimental genetic injections are safe and effective, is either:
a bare-faced liar
completely lacking in integrity
incompetent
completely devoid of knowledge in relation to pharmaceutical medicine and drug safety
delusional
Pfizer is making profits from a product that was extremely poorly designed, manufactured to the worst standards of any pharmaceutical I am aware of, and that is literally being force-injected into hundreds of millions of people, around the world.
I said in a recent Substack that Mr. Bourla should be fired from his job. If you have not read “You’re fired”, feel free to do so now and then come back and read the rest of this Substack.
Perhaps we misunderstand Mr. Bourla. After all, he is the CEO of one of the largest corporations in the pharmaceutical business. To rise to that position and win all the awards he has won in the last year, he must know what he is speaking of. I might add that Pfizer is a corporation I previously had tremendous respect for.
Naturally, given all of this, I began to wonder what Mr. Bourla might be defining as mis-information. Perhaps there is a mis-understanding of what he considers mis-information.
Let’s double check, shall we?
Is it mis-formation …..:
to advise people that they are entitled to informed consent?
to advise people that the Comirnaty product available in the US is not approved. It is available under Emergency Use Authorization only, to ensure that Pfizer will be fully indemnified from any liability.
to advise people that early treatment, including with established medicines, is important?
to advise people that experimental genetic injections are not suitable for everyone - if anyone, at all?
to inform people taking part in clinical trials that Pfizer’s clinical trial insurance will not pay out, if and when, they are injured?
to inform people that the experimental injections are a gene transfer therapy, and not a vaccine in the traditional sense of the word?
to inform people that the VAERS (USA), EUDRAVIGILANCE (EMEA), and YELLOW CARD (UK) systems all show serious adverse reactions and death, to a level not seen before, for any other traditional vaccine, or medicine, for that matter?
to inform people that people have died within a characteristic 0-5 days of receiving these injections, and that their deaths are therefore, at least POSSIBLY RELATED?
to tell people that the experimental gene-based injections do not prevent the recipient from being infected with Sars-Cov-2?
to warn people that the injections do not stop the spread of the Sars-Cov-2 virus from one vaccinated person, to another person (vaccinated or unvaccinated)?
to point people to the website where scientists (from outside Pfizer and regulatory authorities) have been able to decipher and document the batches responsible for the most harm?
This website is www.howbadismybatch.info
to tell people that the injections wane in effectiveness - whatever Pfizer considers effectiveness to be - after weeks rather than months?
to warn people that because repeated injections would be necessary, these Booster injections could ultimately destroy the immune system?
to warn people that auto-immune disease is a real risk with these injections, and is already being seen in those who have taken the injections?
to warn people that there is no way of knowing who will have a good reaction to the injections, and that taking one of these injections is really like playing Russian Roulette?
to advise people that there is strong scientific evidence that natural immunity is better than the waning immunity from the experimental genetic injections?
to advise people that there is no well conducted clinical trial that would require everyone in the clinical trial to be injected with an investigational agent? There always needs to be a comparator.
Given that, why is Pfizer pushing to have the (EUA authorized) experimental injection injected into as many arms as possible? Would that push have anything to do with profits?
to warn people that there is strong scientific evidence to support the fact that the gene-based injections could be causing COVID19 disease?
to tell people that the experimental gene-based injection is causing significant cardiovascular damage in young men, including athletes?
to warn parents that their healthy children are at risk of short term safety consequences of the experimental genetic injections?
to warn parents that their healthy children are at risk of long term safety consequences, and that the risks are unknown?
to advise people that the reason their physicians want them to take the second, third and fourth doses, even though their reactions have been getting progressively worse with each dose, is that the physicians will lose their medical licenses if they speak out against the experimental injections?
to show people the Comirnaty product label, where it provides warnings about cardiovascular and other toxicities?
https://www.fda.gov/media/151707/download, the following information is written in the label for consumers.
“Postmarketing data demonstrate increased risks of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly within 7 days following the second dose. (5.2)”
to inform people that the safety information in the product label downplays the severity of the adverse events.
to inform people that the safety information in the label is not properly written to describe severity, and that
tinnitus after the injections, was so severe, that it caused people to commit suicide?
to inform people that the Phase 3 clinical trial was rife with well-documented fraud?
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rr-41
to tell people that Pfizer has not reached out to a single one of the injured, to help them find an antidote to the mRNA injected into them, after they have been injured by the injections?
Their injuries are life-altering, and soul-destroying. Many of these individuals were previously in excellent health. They were athletes, mothers, fathers, surgeons, you name it. They were making a difference in their sphere of influence, and the Pfizer product destroyed their lives.
to tell people that many of the injured have committed suicide because Pfizer’s campaign to suppress the spread of the truth, means they were isolated and had no one to console them?
Read the stories of the injured on www.realnotrare.com.
to advise people that the reason studies about safety concerns about the experimental injections are not published in major peer reviewed journals, is because pharma spends huge amounts on advertising in these journals. These Dollars buy influence, and effectively corrupt the peer-review process.
As an example, Dr. Jessica Rose’s paper was accepted, and published and then withdrawn by the journal Curr. Probl. Cardiol
The publisher states:
The Publisher regrets that this article has been temporarily removed. A replacement will appear as soon as possible in which the reason for the removal of the article will be specified, or the article will be reinstated.
Citation:
Rose J, McCullough PA. WITHDRAWN: A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2021 Sep 30:101011. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.101011. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34601006; PMCID: PMC8483988.
Furthermore, Mr. Bourla, are these statements mis-information?:
Pfizer worked with the FDA to prevent the release of documents surrounding the approval of the experimental genetic injection, for 75 years.
If Pfizer had nothing to hide, why was it necessary to ensure we would all be dead before the documentation could be released?
The released documents clearly show a carnage of serious adverse reactions and deaths. Such a safety profile would not be tolerated for any other medical product.
Pfizer knew about the poor safety profile of this experimental injection before the product was commercialized, yet commercialized it anyway.
Pfizer understood that the very important, Phase 3 clinical trial would collapse, immediately the gene-based injection was commercialized. This was known because years ago Pfizer had designed a cross over clinical trial for Xeljanz (for Rheumatoid Arthritis), to avoid the loss of the control group.
https://xeljanz.pfizerpro.com/?source=google&HBX_PK=s_ra+medications+xeljanz&skwid=43700066207556151&gclid=Cj0KCQjwjN-SBhCkARIsACsrBz7Kre-KA_HWPAqKcbrpy0tpwzLdgbtUpxn8XU9GJsUIgBXHK3xgN5IaAmnXEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds
The loss of the Phase 3 control group means that the safety portion of the study was lost. The people who take this experimental injection are doing so, without any way of knowing what the long term consequences of this injection will be.
Pfizer’s support for the mixing and matching of Boosters means that it will be difficult to assign causality to Comirnaty when people develop serious adverse reactions, or die.
Pfizer saw so many serious adverse reactions in the first three months after commercialization of Comirnaty under EUA, that Pfizer had to hire 2,400 additional professionals to process the adverse events. This indicates that the volume of serious adverse events was greater than anticipated.
The documentation released under Freedom of Information is being pored over and analyzed by experts, including experts from the relevant fields of regulatory affairs, toxicology, pharmacology, medicine, drug safety, statistics, and so much more. The analysis of the data released so far, is a nightmare should be a nightmare for the PR agencies and lawyers working for Pfizer, except the information is suppressed, and there can be no legal liability for Pfizer whatever is discovered.
Reference: Page 9 of the report.
As a company, Pfizer knew about the risk of anaphylaxis, and that this risk would be difficult to predict, yet the company pushed for the product to be rolled out in settings that would not be appropriate for those who experienced anaphylaxis.
In writing this Substack, I have tried very hard to give Mr. Bourla the benefit of the doubt. Mr. Bourla believes that anyone who does not want to receive the Comirnaty experimental genetic injection must have been misled by bad actors. How could they not want the wonderful Comirnaty injection? After all, Pfizer has been advertising to children that they will receive super powers after they are injected.
Shame on you, Mr. Bourla. Is it mis-information to state the Pfizer advertised directly to children in contravention of standards of common decency, never mind pharmaceutical standards? How did Pfizer pull this off, so that FDA has not objected to these adverts on YouTube? Would it be mis-information to state that Pfizer has a very special relationship with the FDA?
Mr. Bourla, you may be the CEO of Pfizer, but that does not give you the right to dictate to everyone on the planet what they should, and should not inject into their bodies.
The truth is that at least 50% of people in the US, and hundreds of millions, if not Billions more around the world, have seen through the barely sophisticated marketing, and propaganda. They do not want to receive an experimental product, and certainly not these products. They are not impacted by the fear-mongering. They see through the manipulation tactics, and propaganda on steroids.
I understand that CEOs sometimes work in a bubble. They only hear the good news. Mr. Bourla may be quite unaware of what is happening on the ground. Any Pfizer executive, who has an ounce of self respect and integrity, would inform Mr. Bourla of the true state of affairs, and recommend that the EUA-authorized Comirnaty is removed from the market IMMEDIATELY. Pfizer would not be the first company to voluntarily withdraw a medical product from the market. The same applies to the other experimental genetic injections, and the CEOs who oversee the sale of those wares. Withdrawal of these products is long overdue.
The science is clear, these products are not working, and they are unsafe. All around us we see the corruption of a public health system that many of us have been working within, for years ……. and for what? So that companies like Pfizer and Moderna could make huge amounts of money, at the expense of the health of the vulnerable, the trusting, and the unsuspecting.
I hope that all the scientists, physicians and industry professions, who understand what is happening, will continue in their efforts to open the eyes of those at risk of harm. These are the professionals who have integrity. I hope the law firms with deep pockets will get on board with this cause, and bring the lawsuits, and the legal actions needed to right the wrongs.
It saddens me to say that Pfizer has lost my respect, and my trust. The firm has not shown integrity throughout this crisis, and that, Mr. Bourla, is what is criminal.
References
Read the regulatory documents already released for Comirnaty, at the website for, Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency.
https://phmpt.org/
As always, you are encouraged to seek medical advice for your own personal situation. Whatever you read here, should not take the place of your own personal consultation with your qualified and competent medical advisors.
Work copyrighted and owned by Speid & Associates, Inc.
The insane are running the asylum.
That showed their power of control over the media and govts that that punk could project like that with impunity.
People need to pause, switch on and ask questions!