There's risk, and then there's Russian Roulette! [Part 1]
When is taking a medicine not worth the risk?
This is a lengthy article, with two important videos. It is worth your while to read and assimilate the information I am sharing here. Please share with others you care about.
Last week I had the pleasure of speaking to a pharma executive who has recently retired. We had both worked for two top 10 pharmas. Naturally, we spent some time swapping stories, and seeing who we knew in common. Towards the end of a very pleasant, hour-long conversation, in making an argument for the pharmaceutical industry to improve its image, I mentioned the experimental genetic injections. The point I wanted to make was that the pharmaceutical industry has failed to provide appropriate leadership during the Sars-Cov-2 crisis, in relation to the experimental genetic injections. Immediately, I sensed defensiveness and push-back. I almost wished, I had not raised the subject. However, that feeling did not last long.
I have seen too much suffering to care about the feelings of a pharma executive, who lives in a bubble. Afterall, we are almost a year and a half into the roll out of, what are easily, the most disastrous medical products, since the Thalidomide crisis. Yet, he knew nothing, and cared even less about the injuries caused by these injections. When I began to tell him about the catastrophic injuries experienced by many, he immediately began to justify their safety profile in relation to the hundreds of millions who had received the injections.
There is a huge difference between a medicine that has some challenges, and a medicine that involves playing Russian Roulette. What is Russian Roulette? Russian Roulette involves placing one bullet in the chamber of a gun and then spinning the chamber. You then put the gun to your head and pull the trigger, hoping you dodged the bullet. If you are playing this dangerous game with someone else (an enemy perhaps?), you would then pass the gun to them and they would do the same. If their luck was out, they would drop down dead. Please do not try this at home.
When looking at any medicine, it is important to consider the balance between benefits and risks. Think of it like a scale with two arms - on one arm hangs a weighing bowl for risks, and on the other hangs a weighing bowl for benefits.
If the risks weigh more than the benefits, then the medicine should not be administered or taken, especially if people are in good health. It is a sacrosanct rule in drug development that the healthy should not be harmed by any medicine administered to prevent disease.
We have known from the very beginning of the COVID19 pandemic that young healthy people, are not at risk from COVID19. Conversely, we have known that the elderly (above 80 years of age), especially with co-morbidities, are at the greatest risk of death. Yet, the elderly were not protected during the crisis. In nursing homes (at least in the US and UK), the elderly were exposed to other elderly who were known to be infected, or likely to be infected with the Sars-Cov-2 virus. Many died as a result.
One of my issues with the public health agencies, including the EMA (European Union), MHRA (UK), CDC (US), the FDA (US) and the NIH (US) is that they persist in telling the public that the experimental injections have an acceptable safety profile. Yet these agencies provide no data regarding the total number of deaths and serious adverse reactions. By neglecting to collect this information in a rigorious way, they are deliberately keeping people in the dark, about the true safety profile of these experimental injections.
For example, VAERS is the system that is supposed to gather this data in the US, but it suffers from under-reporting because it is a voluntary reporting system. To make matters worse, leaders from the CDC “rubbish” and talk down the VAERS system. By doing so, they actively, and in my opinion, deliberately, discourage the reporting of serious adverse reactions and deaths associated with the experimental genetic injections. The reports received for these injections, even with the under-reporting factor are numerically higher than all the vaccines in the system, when considered together.
Dr. Jessica Rose has analyzed the VAERS database. She presents her findings in the video below. Please take the time to watch this presentation, and come back and read the rest of this article. You will then understand why taking one of these injections is like playing Russian Roulette.
The leaders in at the CDC have erroneously claimed that the deaths in VAERS were not necessarily related to the experimental genetic injections. The pattern of spikes in deaths in days 0-5 after administration of the genetic injections are extremely revealing. Every one of those deaths is at least POSSIBLY RELATED to the experimental genetic injections, due to the relationship to the time of administration. They are most definitely not coincidences.
The process of assigning causality follows a process of investigation, but also medical probability. Until there is good reason to assign another cause, deaths that occur between 0 - 5 days of administration of the experimental genetic injections can reasonably be considered POSSIBLY RELATED to the administration of the experimental genetic injections.
Given this, the safety signals are clear, yet Dr. Walensky (CDC) and Dr. Marks (FDA) continue to ignore them. There are three possible reasons why they are ignoring these troubling safety signals.
The reasons are:
They are grossly incompetent
They are criminal in their negligence
They are corrupt. Corruption can include the existence of financial conflicts of interest. In other words, they benefit financially by taking no action.
What makes this even more like a Shakesparean tragedy than it already is, is that the general public tends to believe that they are competent. They hang on their every word. Recently, the CDC said there was no further need to wear masks. Last weekend, while I was at the local post office, I couldn’t help noticing that most people had dispensed with their masks. The same applies to what the CDC, and FDA say about the safety of the experimental gene-based injections; the FDA and CDC say they are safe, so most of the general US public believes they are safe.
I have studied the various pharmaceutical disasters, including Thalidomide [1] and Diethylstilboestrol [2-6]. I believe that the roll out of these experimental genetic injections, is up there with the Thalidomide disaster.
Dr. Walensky has recently admitted that all data on safety are not being shared for fear of the safety data being misinterpreted. She is concerned that misinterpretation would lead to a reduction in confidence in the gene-based injections. We have all seen and heard about the high numbers of young sportsmen dropping dead all over the world. To take part in these sports all have had to be injected with the experimental genetic injections.
I would like to ask Dr. Walenksy - Can those deaths be misinterpreted? To selectively provide information, so that people will not be detered from taking the injections, is dangerous and criminal. Every time Dr. Walensky speaks, it is clear to anyone who knows a modicum about drug safety and drug development, that she is completely out of her depth.
It is precisely because the general public hangs on their every word, that leaders at the CDC, NIH and FDA who give out misleading information to facilitate the injury or death of others, including children, should be held criminally liable. Likewise, politicians and others who mandate that anyone, including working people, like the truckers, take these experimental genetic injections, or lose their ability to earn a living, should face prison terms when injuries and deaths result from their abuse of power and incompetence.
Remember that this has been ongoing since early 2021. In the US, for example, the FDA, CDC and NIH have known about the deaths. They have known about the injuries. Yet, they persist in stating publicly that the benefits justify the risks. They almost got away with this, except there are mechanisms for tracking deaths that are outside the control of the CDC, NIH and FDA. When lots of working age people die, life insurance companies pay death benefits. When that happens at an alarming rate, they begin to be concerned about their losses. Life insurance companies are now raising the alarm. Note, these aren’t payouts for the 80 -100 year olds that are most susceptible to the Sars-Cov-2 infection and COVID19 disease. These increased payouts coincide and overlap with the roll-out of the experimental injections.
Watch Edward Dowd, a former executive of Blackrock, speak about the deaths among the people of working age. Click on this link, or copy and paste into your browser.
Edward Dowd's presentation - Life science data
The excess death rate data for millenials can be summarized below:
You will be hearing a lot about the crimes against humanity that are being committed in Ukraine, and yes, let’s be outraged about those crimes against humanity. At the same time, let’s not forget the crimes against humanity that were committed over the last 2 years, and that are still being committed. As we demand people are held to account for atrocities committed in Eastern Europe, let’s not provide a free pass for those who are guilty and complicitly committing crimes against humanity here (wherever here is for you).
To my new pharma executive colleague, I would say, being injected with one of these experimental injections is akin to playing Russian Roulette. No one in their right mind plays Russian Roulette. Furthermore, Pharma companies like Pfizer, Moderna and Astra Zeneca (and others involved) should be shamed into creating a fund to take care of the injured around the world. The minimum that they should pay into this fund is $5 Billion each, per year. Yes, we know that they have indemnification. If they deliberately put lives at risk by cutting corners that they know should not be cut, that would amount to gross negligence, if not criminal activity for the sake of profits.
In Part 2 of this series (later this week), I will explain why the batch that was injected into you determined if you experienced serious adverse reactions. Additionally, the batch injected into you determined if you lived or died. How does it feel to have played Russian Roulette?
Watch out for Part 2. In the meantime, share this article with those you care about.
References
Kim JH, Scialli AR. Thalidomide: the tragedy of birth defects and the effective treatment of disease. Toxicol Sci. 2011 Jul;122(1):1-6. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr088. Epub 2011 Apr 19. Erratum in: Toxicol Sci. 2012 Feb;125(2):613. PMID: 21507989.
Professional and Public Relations Committee of the DESAD (Diethylstilbestrol and Adenosis) Project of the Division of Cancer Control and Rehabilitation. Exposure in utero to diethylstilbestrol and related synthetic hormones. Association with vaginal and cervical cancers and other abnormalities. JAMA 1976; 236(10):1107–1109.
Herbst AL, Ulfelder H, Poskanzer DC. Adenocarcinoma of the vagina. Association of maternal stilbestrol therapy with tumor appearance in young women. The New England Journal of Medicine 1971; 284(15):878–881.
FDA Drug Bulletin: Diethylstilbestrol contraindicated in pregnancy. California Medicine 1972; 116(2):85–86.
Giusti RM, Iwamoto K, Hatch EE. Diethylstilbestrol revisited: A review of the long-term health effects. Annals of Internal Medicine 1995; 122(10):778–788.
Palmer JR, Wise LA, Hatch EE, et al. Prenatal diethylstilbestrol exposure and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2006; 15(8):1509–1514.
As always, you are encouraged to seek medical advice for your own personal situation. Whatever you read here, should not take the place of your own personal consultation with your qualified and competent medical advisors.
Thank You! These gutless cowards just keep defending this failed experiment by saying, ‘minor,’ adverse events, and how wonderful the gene therapy while ignoring Ivermectin’s success around the world AND that the fully ‘vaxxed,’ seem to be dying at a much higher rate now. Nuremberg trials are demanded. Although, hopefully, most will hang, at least they will be FORCED to listen to EVIDENCE and DATA at trial.
Rather than the criminal drug makers paying annual fines, they must be destroyed, stripped of all current value, everyone in those companies involved in these crimes must have all blood money clawed back, then all of that can go to the injured and families of those murdered and we can finally remove the permanent home put around the American people to be force fed dangerous symptom-treating meds that don’t address underlying disease. This is the same thing cigarette companies did. America needs the same outcome here to restore balance and hand down true justice.