You don’t really need to go past reason #1. After that, it’s like arguing against child sacrifice: no logic should be necessary.
It boggles the mind that any rational parent would knowingly put their child in the way of potential harm, no matter how noble it might make them feel. A parent’s primary responsibility is to protect their children, even to the extreme of sacrificing their own life if necessary — there is no motivation more noble.
You don’t really need to go past reason #1. After that, it’s like arguing against child sacrifice: no logic should be necessary.
It boggles the mind that any rational parent would knowingly put their child in the way of potential harm, no matter how noble it might make them feel. A parent’s primary responsibility is to protect their children, even to the extreme of sacrificing their own life if necessary — there is no motivation more noble.